DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO,WorldDrugTracker, helping millions, A 90 % paralysed man in action for you, I am suffering from transverse mylitis and bound to a wheel chair, With death on the horizon, nothing will not stop me except God................DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D ( ICT, Mumbai) , INDIA 25Yrs Exp. in the feld of Organic Chemistry,Working for GLENMARK GENERICS at Navi Mumbai, INDIA. Serving chemists around the world. Helping them with websites on Chemistry.Million hits on google, world acclamation from industry, academia, drug authorities for websites, blogs and educational contribution

Sunday 6 March 2016

NMR Chemical Shifts of Trace Impurities: Industrially Preferred Solvents Used in Process and Green Chemistry


Abstract Image
The 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of 48 industrially preferred solvents in six commonly used deuterated NMR solvents (CDCl3, acetone-d6, DMSO-d6, acetonitrile-d3, methanol-d4, and D2O) are reported. 

This work supplements the compilation of NMR data published by Gottlieb, Kotlyar, and Nudelman ( J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7512) by providing spectral parameters for solvents that were not commonly utilized at the time of their original report. 

Data are specifically included for solvents, such as 2-Me-THF, n-heptane, and iso-propyl acetate, which are being used more frequently as the chemical industry aims to adopt greener, safer, and more sustainable solvents. These spectral tables simplify the identification of these solvents as impurities in NMR spectra following their use in synthesis and workup protocols.


Over the past decade, there has been an increasing focus on the application of green chemistry principles throughout the chemical industry. A key component in the development of sustainable chemical processes is solvent, which constitutes approximately half of the mass used in the manufacture of active ingredients.(1) Further emphasizing the importance of solvent choice, one of the 12 Principles of Green Chemistry outlined by Anastas and Warner(2) specifically focuses on the use of safer solvents whenever possible. The implications of solvent selection are also aligned with those principles that encourage the use of more benign chemicals and renewable feedstocks. For example, bioderived solvents, or those that have life cycle advantages, can offer sustainability benefits over more conventional solvents.(3) Several pharmaceutical companies have published solvent selection guides to enable chemists to choose more sustainable solvents, with an emphasis on safety, health, and environmental impact.(4) In an attempt to align the recommendations of the various institutions and encourage the incorporation of these industrially preferred solvents into chemical research, a comprehensive evaluation of all of the solvents was published by the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)–CHEM21(5) in 2014.(6)
Since their publication in 1997, the tables of chemical shifts found in NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities by Gottlieb, Kotlyar, and Nudelman have been an invaluable resource for synthetic chemists to identify residual solvents, e.g., Et2O or THF, in research samples.(7) An expansion of these data tables to include gases and deuterated solvents commonly used in organometallic chemistry was published in 2010.(8) However, several solvents, such as 2-Me-THF, n-heptane, and iso-propyl acetate, were not widely employed at the time of the original publication but have since been recommended in several solvent selection guides based on their improved safety, sustainability, and/or environmental properties. For example, these recommended solvents often have higher flash points, making them more amenable to chemical processes. One shortcoming, however, is that this reduced volatility can make the removal of residual amounts of these solvents more difficult. In addition, the structures of many of these preferred solvents give rise to complex NMR spectra that complicate the assignment of minor impurity resonances. To simplify the identification of these solvents in NMR spectra and facilitate their adoption into chemical processes, we have compiled 1H and 13C NMR data for 48 solvents discussed in the CHEM21 solvent selection guides.(6, 9) Complete NMR spectral parameters for 29 of these solvents have not been previously reported. The compiled data provided herein will serve as a practical resource when these newer, more preferred solvents are encountered as residual impurities in NMR spectra and, in turn, further advance green chemistry initiatives.

1H NMR spectral data for industrially preferred solvents in six commonly used NMR solvents (CDCl3, DMSO-d6, CD3CN, acetone-d6, CD3OD and D2O) are provided in Table 1. Solvents in Table 1 were classified as either recommended (green triangles) or problematic (yellow, upside down triangles) in the initial CHEM21 survey.(6) Problematic solvents pose hazards that can typically be managed in a production environment. Solvents that were rated as hazardous were excluded. Additionally, less-classical solvents (e.g., p-cymene, L-ethyl lactate) that scored better than a 7 in both health and environmental categories from the second communication published by CHEM21 were included.(9) Although NMR data for 19 of these solvents were included in either the original report or the 2010 update,(7, 8) data for an additional 29 solvents were obtained. Furthermore, data for previously reported solvents have been modified to include chemical shift ranges of multiplets. Table 2 contains 13C{1H} NMR data for these same solvent impurities. A tabulation of the 1H and 13C NMR data for all 48 impurities in order of chemical shift is included in the Supporting Information to aid in the assignment of unknown peaks.
Table 1. 1H NMR Data

Table a
Data for these solvents are from refs 7 and 8. Green triangles = Rated as “recommended” in CHEM21 solvent selection guides. Yellow, upside down triangles = Rated as “problematic” in CHEM21 solvent selection guides (see refs 6 and 9).
Table b
Chemical shifts not determined due to reactivity in deuterated solvent.
Table c
Chemical shifts in brackets correspond to −OD isotopomer. See text for more information.
Table d
A second set of resonances was observed for anisole in D2O: 6.79, t (7.9); 6.50–6.43, m; 3.08, s. See text and Supporting Information for more information.
Table e
1,3-Dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone.
Table f
Overlapping −OH and −OD isotopomer resonances were observed.
Table g
1:1:1 triplet, JH–D = 0.8 Hz.
Table 2. 13C NMR Data

Table a
Data for these solvents are from refs 7 and 8. Green triangles = Rated as “recommended” in CHEM21 solvent selection guides. Yellow, upside down triangles = Rated as “problematic” in CHEM21 solvent selection guides (see refs 6 and 9).
Table b
Chemical shifts not determined due to reactivity in deuterated solvent.
Table c
Chemical shifts in brackets correspond to −OD isotopomer. See text for more information.
Table d
Solvent was analyzed individually, not in pairs.
Table e
1,3-Dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone.




This article references 12 other publications.
  1. 1.
    Jimenez-Gonzalez, C.; Ponder, C. S.; Broxterman, Q. B.; Manley, J. B. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 912, DOI: 10.1021/op200097d
  2. 2.
    Anastas, P. T.; Warner, J. C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.
  3. 3.
    Kerton, F. M.; Marriott, R. Alternative Solvents for Green Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Royal Society Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2013.
  4. 4.
    (a)
    Pfizer:
    Alfonsi, K.; Colberg, J.; Dunn, P. J.; Fevig, T.; Jennings, S.; Johnson, T. A.; Kleine, H. P.; Knight, C.; Nagy, M. A.; Perry, D. A.; Stefaniak, M. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 31, DOI: 10.1039/B711717E
    (b)
    GSK:
    Henderson, R. K.; Jimenez-Gonzalez, C.; Constable, D. J. C.; Alston, S. R.; Inglis, G. G. A.; Fisher, G.; Sherwood, J.; Binks, S. P.; Curzons, A. D. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 854, DOI: 10.1039/c0gc00918k
    (c)
    Sanofi:
    Prat, D.; Pardigon, O.; Flemming, H. W.; Letestu, S.; Ducandas, V.; Isnard, P.; Guntrum, E.; Senac, T.; Ruisseau, S.; Cruciani, P.; Hosek, P. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013, 17, 1517, DOI: 10.1021/op4002565
    (d) AstraZeneca: Not published, but presented at the GCI- Pharmaceutical Roundtable in 2008. See “Collaboration to Deliver a Solvent Selection Guide for the Pharmaceutical Industry”, by C. R. Hargreaves, and J. B. Manley under publications on the GCI-PR website: http://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/greenchemistry/industry-business/pharmaceutical.html (accessed Jan 15, 2016) .
    (e)
    GCI-PR: Document titled “Solvent Selection Guide”, under tools on the GCI-PR website (see above)
    .
  5. 5.
    (a) http://www.imi.europa.eu; (accessed Jan 15, 2016) .
    (b) http://www.chem21.eu (accessed Jan 15, 2016) .
  6. 6.
    Prat, D.; Hayler, J.; Wells, A. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 4546, DOI: 10.1039/C4GC01149J
  7. 7.
    Gottlieb, H. E.; Kotlyar, V.; Nudelman, A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7512, DOI: 10.1021/jo971176v
  8. 8.
    Fulmer, G. R.; Miller, A. J. M.; Sherden, N. H.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Nudelman, A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Bercaw, J. E.; Goldberg, K. I. Organometallics 2010, 29, 2176, DOI: 10.1021/om100106e
  9. 9.
    (a) Prat, D.; Wells, A.; Hayler, J.; Sneddon, H.; McElroy, C. R.; Abou-Shehada, S.; Dunn, P. J. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4848, DOI: 10.1039/C5GC90049B
    (b) Prat, D.; Wells, A.; Hayler, J.; Sneddon, H.; McElroy, C. R.; Abou-Shehada, S.; Dunn, P. J. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 288, DOI: 10.1039/C5GC01008J
  10. 10.
    Pohl, L.; Eckle, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 381, DOI: 10.1002/anie.196903811
  11. 11.
    Reuben, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1756, DOI: 10.1021/ja00292a050
  12. 12.
    (a) Giuliano, B. M.; Caminati, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 603, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200461860
    (b) Mazzoni, F.; Pasquini, M.; Pietraperzia, G.; Becucci, M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 11268, DOI: 10.1039/c3cp50191d

NMR Chemical Shifts of Trace Impurities: Industrially Preferred Solvents Used in Process and Green Chemistry

Process Chemistry, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Rd., Indianapolis, Indiana 46268, United States
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00417
Publication Date (Web): February 19, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society
ACS Editors' Choice - This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.oprd.5b00417

//////////






DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO .....FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE

Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK
Join me on twitterFollow amcrasto on Twitter     
Join me on google plus Googleplus

 amcrasto@gmail.com



Khajuraho Group of Monuments is located in India
Khajuraho Group of Monuments
Location of Khajuraho Group of Monuments in India.
Location in Madhya PradeshLocation in Madhya Pradesh

  1. Khajuraho Group of Monuments - Wikipedia, the free ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khajuraho_Group_of_Monuments

    The Khajuraho Group of Monuments are a group of Hindu and Jain temples in Madhya Pradesh, India. About 620 kilometres (385 mi) southeast of New Delhi, ...
Hotel Chandela - A Taj Leisure Hotel




No comments:

Post a Comment